A Communiqué
Jun. 19th, 2008 04:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...left in my voicemail today, transcribed verbatim:
"Hi Victoria it's me, XXXXX, from Payroll. Uh, it is the change of rate for Smith John is fine, so if he needs to multiply hours times 9.85 that is the rate as he is supposed to get, is fine. But if you want call me back, please 19999. All right? Bye bye."
(Generated by me asking about the fact that John Smith, who had had a pay increase back in March to $9.85/hr, had not seen said increase & back pay reflected in his paychecks.)
"Hi Victoria it's me, XXXXX, from Payroll. Uh, it is the change of rate for Smith John is fine, so if he needs to multiply hours times 9.85 that is the rate as he is supposed to get, is fine. But if you want call me back, please 19999. All right? Bye bye."
(Generated by me asking about the fact that John Smith, who had had a pay increase back in March to $9.85/hr, had not seen said increase & back pay reflected in his paychecks.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-19 09:09 pm (UTC)->French->Greek->English:
"Buongiorno Victoria it'? ; s I the seat am realised where. With regard to his Uh with the John'? finally? s-Verhältnis Smith c'? it is a modification, because s'? ; Thus, it is? With regard to this time d'? ; Should you it increases you? Maintaining him 9.85 qu'? ; C'? they are relations in t o respect? From then this more, l'? acquisition that is good his is, becomes acceptable. But in with l'? ; If you think that we wish? Wish [opisthen] and content 19999. l'? ; Order? L'? ; Way if."
Loses no coherence whatsoever.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-20 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-20 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-20 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-20 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-20 03:25 pm (UTC)I think she is trying to say that Payroll's systems have him at the correct rate. Except that we already knew that, because she'd told it to me in our first conversation. So, I've got nothin'.