he won't post it, so I will
Nov. 21st, 2005 11:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Herewith,
dariodevil's polemic on the problems with the more recent takes on Superman (Jeph Loeb, I'm looking at you, you talentless hack).
(11:04:20) Dariodevil: Everyone who doesn't like Superman loves Morrison's Superman. In particular, people love how "the disguise works!" because clumsy dorky Clark Kent slouches so much and looks different and all that.
(11:04:40) Dariodevil: And everyone keeps pointing to the old stuff, the Weisinger stuff, about how THAT'S Superman, that's how it's supposed to be.
(11:04:45) Dariodevil: The stuff the Onion commented on.
(11:05:02) Dariodevil: The stuff that made everyone hate the character by the time the fucking '78 film came out.
(11:05:09) Dariodevil: You know what I remember?
(11:05:39) Dariodevil: I remember the early '90s, when it was widely known that the weekly Superman books were, pound for pound, the best all-around superhero title ever, with a tight continuity and a good supporting cast and a contemporary take on a classic character.
(11:06:13) Dariodevil: All the barnacles were cleaned off the battleship, as John Byrne wanted. The mythos had been streamlined, so its aspects were not punchlines.
(11:06:36) Dariodevil: There were no superpets, no many varieties of kryptonite, no endless supply of kryptonians, no "disguise," none of it.
(11:06:42) Dariodevil: And the loud minority keep screaming.
(11:06:45) Dariodevil: Over and over and over.
(11:06:49) Dariodevil: About how Superman's lost his way.
(11:07:03) Dariodevil: My fucking Superman was a better CHARACTER. He made for better STORIES.
(11:07:09) Dariodevil: But everyone wants him to be a certain way.
(11:07:16) Dariodevil: And then when he is, after six months, they won't care.
(11:07:41) Dariodevil: And then I'll be stuck with fucking dogs in capes and rainbow-colored kryptonite and once again having to defend "an archaic, obselete, tired character that has no relevance in the 21st century."
(11:07:44) Dariodevil: OH, WAIT.
(11:07:48) Dariodevil: IT'S ALREADY HAPPENED.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
(11:04:20) Dariodevil: Everyone who doesn't like Superman loves Morrison's Superman. In particular, people love how "the disguise works!" because clumsy dorky Clark Kent slouches so much and looks different and all that.
(11:04:40) Dariodevil: And everyone keeps pointing to the old stuff, the Weisinger stuff, about how THAT'S Superman, that's how it's supposed to be.
(11:04:45) Dariodevil: The stuff the Onion commented on.
(11:05:02) Dariodevil: The stuff that made everyone hate the character by the time the fucking '78 film came out.
(11:05:09) Dariodevil: You know what I remember?
(11:05:39) Dariodevil: I remember the early '90s, when it was widely known that the weekly Superman books were, pound for pound, the best all-around superhero title ever, with a tight continuity and a good supporting cast and a contemporary take on a classic character.
(11:06:13) Dariodevil: All the barnacles were cleaned off the battleship, as John Byrne wanted. The mythos had been streamlined, so its aspects were not punchlines.
(11:06:36) Dariodevil: There were no superpets, no many varieties of kryptonite, no endless supply of kryptonians, no "disguise," none of it.
(11:06:42) Dariodevil: And the loud minority keep screaming.
(11:06:45) Dariodevil: Over and over and over.
(11:06:49) Dariodevil: About how Superman's lost his way.
(11:07:03) Dariodevil: My fucking Superman was a better CHARACTER. He made for better STORIES.
(11:07:09) Dariodevil: But everyone wants him to be a certain way.
(11:07:16) Dariodevil: And then when he is, after six months, they won't care.
(11:07:41) Dariodevil: And then I'll be stuck with fucking dogs in capes and rainbow-colored kryptonite and once again having to defend "an archaic, obselete, tired character that has no relevance in the 21st century."
(11:07:44) Dariodevil: OH, WAIT.
(11:07:48) Dariodevil: IT'S ALREADY HAPPENED.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:03 pm (UTC)For the record, despite my ambivalence toward the big blue creampuff in general, I detest Morrison's Superman. I suspect that it's more for the crapfest "story" that was All-Star Superman #1.
It was a goddamn mission to the surface of the motherfucking SUN. Fuck realism, right? this is DYNAMIC! W00T!
Oh, and the slouching was teh ghey.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 07:55 pm (UTC)Yeah. thought not.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 08:19 pm (UTC)Yeah. Thought so. :-D
Although the Jason Todd arc in the core title is great. "City of Crime" has turned into Bats' own "For Tomorrow," sadly. Except the art sucks Republican cock.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 08:47 pm (UTC)considered sleeping withliked.no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:29 pm (UTC)She slowly pulled back the covers to reveal her naked body, glistening with desire for her beloved. Also, kryptonite. Seven different multicolored kinds. Also, she had tentacles. Seven of them. And did I mention the dog?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:03 pm (UTC)AND WE NEED TO TEAM-UP WITH OUR GOLDEN AGE SELVES ALONG THE WAY!!! :D
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:07 pm (UTC)I am failing.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:26 pm (UTC)And he doesn't dress flamboyantly. He dresses like a newsboy!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:36 pm (UTC)Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to get rid of my spitcurl with loads of expensive hair gel. I'd better take off my bright Hawaiian shirt to make sure it doesn't get greasy.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:23 pm (UTC)I hope they didn't drink the water.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:38 pm (UTC)That,s right, Tori. i'm single. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:48 pm (UTC)Undead chicks in ornate hats give me mahogany.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 08:40 pm (UTC)After reading All-Star Superman again, I sat down and read All-Star Batman & Robin the Boy Wonder again. It magically became palatable.
And I'd comment on "City of Crime", but honestly, I've been buying the issues and just putting them away without reading them. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 09:59 pm (UTC)EAT SHIT AND DIE.
After reading All-Star Superman again, I sat down and read All-Star Batman & Robin the Boy Wonder again. It magically became palatable.
NOTHING makes the infamous "Are you retarded?!" scene palatable. I'm holding out for the revelation that the events of #2 were because of the gas Bats used on Dick. But even with that taken into account, there's a predatory pedophile vibe from Bruce Wayne that's not subtle at all. It makes the book uncomfortable.
And I'd comment on "City of Crime", but honestly, I've been buying the issues and just putting them away without reading them. Sigh.
Wow, ditto. I plan on reading it all in one sitting, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:22 pm (UTC)Hey, you read OMAC. I heart Rucka.
NOTHING makes the infamous "Are you retarded?!" scene palatable. I'm holding out for the revelation that the events of #2 were because of the gas Bats used on Dick. But even with that taken into account, there's a predatory pedophile vibe from Bruce Wayne that's not subtle at all. It makes the book uncomfortable.
And I still prefer it over "OH NOES! Our mission to the surface of the SUN somehow inexplicably ent wrong!!1!!
I hope Clark ask Lois marry him.
Wow, ditto. I plan on reading it all in one sitting, though.
Same here. I gave up on reading each issue after I realized that issue 4 had zero to do with issue 1.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:30 pm (UTC)That wasn't a Batstory. That was a DCU story. Bats was just a central figure. You know, 'cause it was all his fault. :D
And I still prefer it over "OH NOES! Our mission to the surface of the SUN somehow inexplicably went wrong!!1!!
Yeah, well, you Batfans have a higher tolerance for pedophilia subtext than normal people. :D
I hope Clark ask Lois marry him.
Has it been three years already? And yet... it's still funny.
I'll explain it later, Tori.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 10:41 pm (UTC)Hey, his paranoia was justified. JUSTIFIED! *whimper*
Yeah, well, you Batfans have a higher tolerance for pedophilia subtext than normal people. :D
That wa suncalled for. So was this:
Daredevil - The hero with such a complex emotional subtext that the only possible choice to play him was Ben Affleck.
Has it been three years already? And yet... it's still funny.
The classics never die. Except during some sort of Crisis.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 03:27 pm (UTC)OWN3D!!1
(This is never going to end, is it?)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 04:02 pm (UTC)I was too lazy to find a decent picture of Affleck's Daredevil or Dean Cain's Superman. Also, afraid of what other homobat pictures you undoubtedly have bookmarked and view thirty times a day.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 05:56 pm (UTC)Down from fifty-two, due to the scabbing.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:10 pm (UTC)so.
SO GLAD I have never watched that show, though I've wandered past it on your TiVo. I think it might actually cause me more pain than watching the Daredevil movie will.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:22 pm (UTC)Also, my presence, to defend the actual mythologies that are being defiled before you.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:40 pm (UTC)Oh wait.
Damn it.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 03:52 am (UTC)I mean, i giggled at Ellis's Clark-Lois dialogue in his recent JLA arc, but christ, ENOUGH already.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 05:30 am (UTC)No offense, of course.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 03:20 pm (UTC)You're entitled to your opinion. Just like Creationists and Harry Potter fans.
The Morrison Superman was entertaining, but it hardly matters.
So you just contradicted yourself in the second sentence. And it does matter, seeing as how you just said he was boring, yet you weren't bored by him.
Millar's "Red Son" was OK.
Again, you state that you enjoyed a Superman story. And yes, I know it's an Elseworlds. Point is, you rip on Superman, then state you read and enjoyed two stories of his.
But there is NOTHING that can be done with Superman anymore.
Your cynicism is entertaining. Because YOU can't think of anything to do with a character, than clearly no one else can. It's not as if DC couldn't say, I don't know... deal with him raising a child, weighing the burden of leadership on a community of superpeople who look at him as a messianic figure, or even dealing with his unwanted association with the American government during an immoral war with a middle-eastern country. Oh, wait, that's what's being done now. Just a few things off the top of my head.
Superman is an archetypal character. He's an icon that has as many interpretations as there are people in the world. He represents something simple - hope. He was created during the Great Depression as an escape, a reporter/vigilante who looked out for the little guy, and his scope grew over the years to encompass everything from that to more cosmic adventures. He's the original hero. The characters always been about tomorrow. That's why he remains an icon, whereas someone like Cable gets a massive conceptual overhaul after only a decade; because nihilism is a limited concept. Cynicism is destructive. Being a "cool badass with a gun" has a shelf life. Your grandparents know who Superman is, and so will your grandchildren.
Superman, now 68 years old (I believe), represents the future as opposed to the past, not suffering from an increasingly trite and cliched mind-set that stinks of despair, but instead availing himself of a forward-looking and optimistic kind of vision that, though aware of the black depths to which free will allows men to plumb, does not devise methods based on the notion that hope has died (or never existed).
As long as there are stories about good and evil, there will be Superman.
Most of those characters, really.
Your opinions are fascinating, and well-supported. Can I subscribe to your fanzine.
They have too much suck baggage.
Also known as "continuity."
Also known as, "it was better when I was 10, now I don't like it, I want it back the way it was! Wah!"
DC should kill them all off in their precious Infinite Crisis.
Sort of like how someone should throw something away because they themselves are too dumb and/or imaginative to think of how to use it, eh? :-D
For what it's worth, your opinion is fine. Just don't step in and start attacking something, with your supporting argument being "it sucks because I say it sucks."
I mean, i giggled at Ellis's Clark-Lois dialogue in his recent JLA arc, but christ, ENOUGH already.
Meaning, once again, you were entertained, but you still say it sucks because... you say it sucks.
Dude. I looked at your LJ, and you seem like an intelligent person. If I commented on your LJ that Pearl Jam sucks because I don't like them and I think they suck, how would you feel?
You're better than this.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 09:27 pm (UTC)I should qualify all the "suck" and "entertain" stuff. I meant that i was lightly entertained by the stories, but i wouldn't buy them, and in the end they're not "good" stories, stories that stay with me and make me care about the characters. They're just bagatelles.
The baggage i'm talking about is the endless tinkering i've observed in the last fifteen years, with the whole "Death of Superman" nonsense and the "oh no Superman put on a tainted suit and now he's living lightning" crap and the endless "let's look at Superman's history from yet another angle!" rehashes. There are worthy attempts out there, like that one story about the kid named Clark Kent, but maybe it's just that the story's too familiar to me.
Superman is, as you say, an archetype. And archetypes, by and large, are bored and old these days. It's rare that someone can take an archetype and make something i consider a lasting product. In the end, it's more about DC milking the hell out of their cash cow than writing a good story. And that's sad.
Lastly, i know lots of people who think Pearl Jam sucks, or that "Ten" was their only good album. Some have valid reasons, some don't. No skin off my nose. I do appreciate the "You're better than this" comment, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 09:48 pm (UTC)I had no history with Superman continuity etc., nor with DC in general (I Was A Teenage Marvel Zombie!), and just had this sort of vague impression of Superman as an all-powerful godlike being who'd been around so long he was his own stereotype. Boring. Wasn't interested.
When we started hanging out, Dario lent me first the immediate post-Crisis Byrne stuff (and that which came right after), and then the death/funeral/Four Supermen, No Waiting/resolution arc, interspersed with random other issues (mostly more modern). And I found I really, really enjoyed them; they stayed with me and made me care about the characters, to the point where you could fairly describe me as a "fan". I don't feel that the loads of hoary baggage attached like limpets to the common perception of What Is Superman has impeded my enjoyment of those excellent stories at all. If anything, perhaps the opposite--I found that the reality was far, far better than I'd ever imagined it could have been.
(I have read next to none of the Electric Superman era, which I'm pretty sure I'm happy about. And I do think Pearl Jam sucks, except for "Evenflow".)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 09:51 pm (UTC)ZOMG HOW DARE U!!!! EDDY VEDDUR IS LIKE UNTO A GOD. AND STUFF.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 10:06 pm (UTC)This would be like criticizing a band whose album you haven't heard.
The baggage i'm talking about is the endless tinkering i've observed in the last fifteen years, with the whole "Death of Superman" nonsense
You mean the really interesting, touching stories that took what could have been a shameless commercial and made it something a lot more?
Superman is, as you say, an archetype. And archetypes, by and large, are bored and old these days.
It's not the characters, it's what you do with them. Imagination is all that's needed to make anything work.
It's rare that someone can take an archetype and make something i consider a lasting product.
What you consider a lasting product, and what is a lasting product, seem to be different.
In the end, it's more about DC milking the hell out of their cash cow than writing a good story. And that's sad.
The guy who doesn't read comics is telling me this. Yeah.
Greg Rucka has currently written some absolutely wonderful Superman stories, which happen to touch on the topics I covered above.
I do appreciate the "You're better than this" comment, though.
I get touchy when it comes to Big Blue. :) I know you don't mean any real harm, so I wanted to make it clear I respect you, but I'm really obnoxious when it comes to Superman. I love him like a father. I have to defend his honor. It's a sickness, I tell you! :D
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 11:40 pm (UTC)What, you're trying to tell me i have to read all the Superman you've read so that my opinion will carry some weight with you?
Note that i'm actually not taking your "doesn't read comics" literally, since i'm sure you've noticed that i DO read comics.
And by "lasting product" i don't mean a product that lasts and lasts due to the efforts of its corporate master.
Rucka is a fine writer, but his efforts would be better applied in a fresher milieu.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 11:41 pm (UTC)